1983 Lincoln Continental vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 500 kg more than 1992 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lincoln Continental | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Lincoln | Toyota |
Model | Continental | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1983 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1910 mm |