1983 Lincoln Continental vs. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Lincoln Continental | 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | |
| Make | Lincoln | Pininfarina |
| Model | Continental | Metrocubo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4940 cc | 505 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
