1983 Lincoln Continental vs. 2005 Renault Megane

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lincoln Continental (114 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 84 kg more than 1983 Lincoln Continental.

Because 1983 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Lincoln Continental (210 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1983 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications: