1983 Lincoln Continental vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lincoln Continental (129 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1983 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lincoln Continental | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Lincoln | Ford |
Model | Continental | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1983 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2490 mm |