1983 Lincoln Continental vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1983 Lincoln Continental.
Because 1983 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (210 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lincoln Continental.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lincoln Continental | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Lincoln | Holden |
Model | Continental | Cruze |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2685 mm |