1983 Lotus Excel vs. 1956 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1983 Lotus Excel is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Lotus Excel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lotus Excel (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1956 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lotus Excel should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lotus Excel weights approximately 295 kg more than 1956 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lotus Excel | 1956 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Lotus | Maserati |
Model | Excel | A6G |
Year Released | 1983 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2174 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2560 mm |