1983 Lotus Excel vs. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1983 Lotus Excel is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 165 kg more than 1983 Lotus Excel.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lotus Excel | 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Lotus | Studebaker |
Model | Excel | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1983 | 1958 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2174 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2980 mm |