1983 Lotus Excel vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lotus Excel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lotus Excel would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Lotus Excel is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lotus Excel weights approximately 31 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lotus Excel | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | Excel | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1983 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 2174 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1910 mm |