1983 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 231 kg more than 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Maserati Bi Turbo | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Maserati | Oldsmobile |
Model | Bi Turbo | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1983 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2568 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2680 mm |