1983 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo. (182 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo. (305 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Maserati | Holden |
| Model | Bi Turbo | Calais |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
