1983 Maserati Merak vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Maserati Merak is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Maserati Merak (157 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2009 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Maserati Merak should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Because 1983 Maserati Merak is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Maserati Merak. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Maserati Merak | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Maserati | Holden |
| Model | Merak | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 139 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2685 mm |
