1983 Maserati Merak vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Maserati Merak is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Maserati Merak (157 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Maserati Merak should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.
Because 1983 Maserati Merak is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Maserati Merak. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Maserati Merak | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | Merak | 3 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2639 mm |
