1983 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena (116 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 90 kg more than 1980 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Matra-Simca Murena | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Seat |
Model | Murena | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1983 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2156 cc | 1714 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2460 mm |