1983 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda CR-V (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 450 kg more than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Matra-Simca Murena | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Honda |
Model | Murena | CR-V |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2156 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 172 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2630 mm |