1983 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena (116 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 450 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | 2010 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Tata |
| Model | Murena | Nano |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2156 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2230 mm |
