1983 Mazda 323 vs. 1972 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1983 Mazda 323 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,071 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda 323 (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1972 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1972 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda 323 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1972 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda 323 (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1983 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda 323 | 1972 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Mazda | ZAZ |
Model | 323 | 966 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1071 cc | 885 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2170 mm |