1983 Mazda 323 vs. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1983 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 323. (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda 323 | 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 323 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1071 cc | 4157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 374 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2880 mm |