1983 Mazda 323 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 725 kg more than 1983 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Epica (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 323. (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda 323 | 2011 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 323 | Epica |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1071 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2710 mm |