1983 Mazda 323 vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 323. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 323.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 323. (79 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Mazda 323 | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Mazda | Jeep |
| Model | 323 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1071 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2916 mm |
