1983 Mazda 929 vs. 2006 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S40 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S40 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1983 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda 929 (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo S40. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda 929 | 2006 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 929 | S40 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2650 mm |