1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1942 Renault Juva
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1942 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1942 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 274 kg more than 1942 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1942 Renault Juva | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Cosmo | Juva |
Year Released | 1983 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1003 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2360 mm |