1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1959 NSU Prinz I
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 NSU Prinz I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 NSU Prinz I would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1959 NSU Prinz I. (20 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1959 NSU Prinz I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 574 kg more than 1959 NSU Prinz I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 NSU Prinz I. (41 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1983 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 NSU Prinz I.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1959 NSU Prinz I | |
Make | Mazda | NSU |
Model | Cosmo | Prinz I |
Year Released | 1983 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 583 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 41 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 66 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 516 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2010 mm |