1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1965 Trabant P 601
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Trabant P 601. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Trabant P 601 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1965 Trabant P 601. (23 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1965 Trabant P 601. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 475 kg more than 1965 Trabant P 601. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Trabant P 601, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Trabant P 601. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1983 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Trabant P 601.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1965 Trabant P 601 | |
Make | Mazda | Trabant |
Model | Cosmo | P 601 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 23 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 53 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2030 mm |