1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 158 kg more than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1983 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | Cosmo | 2000 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1248 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |