1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1974 Steyr 126
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Steyr 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Steyr 126 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1974 Steyr 126. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1974 Steyr 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 505 kg more than 1974 Steyr 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1974 Steyr 126 | |
Make | Mazda | Steyr |
Model | Cosmo | 126 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1974 |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 641 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1850 mm |