1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1976 TVR M
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 TVR M would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 195 kg more than 1976 TVR M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1976 TVR M | |
| Make | Mazda | TVR |
| Model | Cosmo | M |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2290 mm |
