1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx

To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 140 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Mazda Cosmo 1982 Mercury Lynx
Make Mazda Mercury
Model Cosmo Lynx
Year Released 1983 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1769 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 93 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 79.5 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1090 kg 950 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2400 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]