1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, both 1983 Mazda Cosmo and 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass were released in the same year (1983). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 230 kg more than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cosmo | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1983 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2680 mm |