1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1986 Renault Super 5
To start off, 1986 Renault Super 5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1986 Renault Super 5. (41 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault Super 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 395 kg more than 1986 Renault Super 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault Super 5. (66 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault Super 5.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1986 Renault Super 5 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Cosmo | Super 5 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 66 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2410 mm |