1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1988 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1988 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 85 kg more than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1988 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | Cosmo | Sundance |
Year Released | 1983 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2470 mm |