1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1995 SsangYong Chairman H
To start off, 1995 SsangYong Chairman H is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 SsangYong Chairman H is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 SsangYong Chairman H, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 SsangYong Chairman H (312 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (149 Nm). This means 1995 SsangYong Chairman H will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. 1995 SsangYong Chairman H has automatic transmission and 1983 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1983 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 SsangYong Chairman H will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1995 SsangYong Chairman H | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | Cosmo | Chairman H |
Year Released | 1983 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 149 Nm | 312 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |