1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1996 Vauxhall Astra
To start off, 1996 Vauxhall Astra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1996 Vauxhall Astra. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1996 Vauxhall Astra.
Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Vauxhall Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Vauxhall Astra. (127 Nm). This means 1983 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Vauxhall Astra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Mazda Cosmo | 1996 Vauxhall Astra | |
| Make | Mazda | Vauxhall |
| Model | Cosmo | Astra |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
