1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2002 Riley MR II
To start off, 2002 Riley MR II is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 7,996 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Riley MR II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 30 kg more than 2002 Riley MR II.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 2002 Riley MR II | |
Make | Mazda | Riley |
Model | Cosmo | MR II |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 7996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2650 mm |