1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2005 Pagani Zonda is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 449 more horse power than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 160 kg more than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda Cosmo | 2005 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Mazda | Pagani |
Model | Cosmo | Zonda |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2730 mm |