1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2010 Fiat Strada

To start off, 2010 Fiat Strada is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Strada. (86 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Strada.

Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Strada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Strada (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Strada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Mazda Cosmo 2010 Fiat Strada
Make Mazda Fiat
Model Cosmo Strada
Year Released 1983 2010
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1769 cc 1248 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 93 HP 86 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 1750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 69.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 82 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4444 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1644 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1230 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2718 mm