1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2011 Ford F-250

To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. 2011 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 1983 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1983 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Mazda Cosmo 2011 Ford F-250
Make Mazda Ford
Model Cosmo F-250
Year Released 1983 2011
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1769 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 93 HP 385 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 548 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 6269 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 2029 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1966 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 3967 mm