1983 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 Honda Jazz

To start off, 2012 Honda Jazz is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Jazz (118 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.

Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Jazz. (145 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1983 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Jazz.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Mazda Cosmo 2012 Honda Jazz
Make Mazda Honda
Model Cosmo Jazz
Year Released 1983 2012
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1769 cc 1497 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 93 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 3910 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1530 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2510 mm