1983 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1976 Rover 2000

To start off, 1983 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Rover 2000 (142 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rover 2000 weights approximately 272 kg more than 1983 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Rover 2000 (272 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda RX-7.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Mazda RX-7 1976 Rover 2000
Make Mazda Rover
Model RX-7 2000
Year Released 1983 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2292 cc 3532 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 105 HP 142 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 272 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1060 kg 1332 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1270 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2640 mm