1983 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1995 Seat Toledo
To start off, 1995 Seat Toledo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,324 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1995 Seat Toledo.
Because 1983 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Seat Toledo (205 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm). This means 1995 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda RX-7 | 1995 Seat Toledo | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | RX-7 | Toledo |
Year Released | 1983 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2324 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 205 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1055 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2480 mm |