1983 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1983 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura CSX weights approximately 253 kg more than 1983 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda RX-7 | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | RX-7 | CSX |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |