1983 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1983 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A5 (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2010 Audi A5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A5 (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mazda RX-7 | 2010 Audi A5 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | RX-7 | A5 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 67 L |