1983 Mercedes-Benz 190 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercedes-Benz 190 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1983 Mercedes-Benz 190. (88 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercedes-Benz 190. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 269 kg more than 1983 Mercedes-Benz 190. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Mercedes-Benz 190 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mercedes-Benz 190. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 165 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Mercedes-Benz 190 2006 Toyota Matrix
Make Mercedes-Benz Toyota
Model 190 Matrix
Year Released 1983 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1786 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 88 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 165 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80.3 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1086 kg 1355 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.4 L/100km 6.5 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.7 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.1 L/100km 7.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]