1983 Mercury Cougar vs. 1990 Volvo 240
To start off, 1990 Volvo 240 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 190 kg more than 1990 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mercury Cougar | 1990 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Cougar | 240 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |