1983 Mercury Cougar vs. 1995 Rover 800
To start off, 1995 Rover 800 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,675 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 800 weights approximately 44 kg more than 1983 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1983 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mercury Cougar | 1995 Rover 800 | |
Make | Mercury | Rover |
Model | Cougar | 800 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |