1983 Mercury Cougar vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 860 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Because 1983 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mercury Cougar | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Mercury | Mini |
Model | Cougar | MK VI |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 41 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2040 mm |