1983 Mercury Cougar vs. 2001 Toyota RSC
To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,164 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota RSC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 84 kg more than 2001 Toyota RSC.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Mercury Cougar | 2001 Toyota RSC | |
| Make | Mercury | Toyota |
| Model | Cougar | RSC |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 194 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1396 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |
