1983 Mercury Cougar vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 371 kg more than 1983 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mercury Cougar | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mercury | Jeep |
Model | Cougar | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1851 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2423 mm |