1983 Mercury Cougar vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 120 kg more than 1983 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mercury Cougar | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Mercury | Chevrolet |
Model | Cougar | Orlando |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 174 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1836 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2760 mm |