1983 Mercury Cougar vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mercury Cougar | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Mercury | Smart |
Model | Cougar | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1559 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1867 mm |