1983 Mercury Lynx vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 1983 Mercury Lynx is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Simca Aronde (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Simca Aronde should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mercury Lynx (111 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 1983 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mercury Lynx | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Mercury | Simca |
Model | Lynx | Aronde |
Year Released | 1983 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 90 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2450 mm |